About Noemi.andres

Noemi.andres · ‎06-25-2021

I am experiencing the same issue as @aperlstein where if the values have been pasted in instead of keying them in manually then the undo functionality does not work. Do we know if this is being looked into?

Noemi.andres · ‎01-18-2021

Agree with @MaartenGijbels , this would be a great addition to the NUX functionalities, would speed up the build of charts with the right look&feel. Also as this functionality is available in the classic dashboards I hope it is something that is being looked into?

Noemi.andres · ‎01-15-2021

Totally agree with @Ingilavicus that the option to set up the filter from a custom view would be more dynamic. For instance, with the current functionality it isn't an option to allow the end-user to pivot the table within a Worksheet as you need to set up the line item filter within a saved view of the module and use that saved view for the grid in the NUX. It would be ideal to have the option of creating the same LIS filters within within the Custom Views.

Noemi.andres · ‎11-17-2020

This new functionality is a great addition! I would love to see it going a bit further with versions being managed as Production Data entirely. The main benefit would be having less number of versions in DEV/TEST models than in PROD which would be more efficient and reduce the size of DEV/TEST models further.

Noemi.andres · ‎11-09-2020

Hi @tejaswini You will need an additional line item formatted as boolean. Then you can amend the formula in the final expenses line item so that when the user ticks the box in the new boolean line item the final expenses value is overriden to zero.

Noemi.andres · ‎11-02-2020

@tejaswini Looking at @filip.sypniewski screenshots, you could enhance this further for the end user by having all the inputs in the same module, so there's just one input/output table. See attached an example!

Noemi.andres · ‎11-02-2020

Hi @JoanneM The first thing that comes to my mind is that you're trying to pull the medical costs from a module dimensioned by Region and Role to your target module, dimensioned by Dept and Role. The difference on the dimensionality is the Region vs Dept. However your lookup is based on the Employees system module, so dimensioned by Employees. I think you need to find where in your model you are calculating the medical costs by employee so you can aggregate it by Region and Department accordingly. Hope this helps!

Noemi.andres · ‎11-02-2020

Re-sizing the columns in the NUX is possible at the moment. However the ability to resize the column width for the nested dimensions would be a great addition. In this way the user can decide what's the column width taken by each of the various nested lists instead of both taking the same space on the screen.

Noemi.andres · ‎10-30-2020

At the moment in order to transfer data between models manually it is required to open the target model and pull/import the data from there. Having the additional functionality of running an export from the source model to the target (pushing the data instead of pulling it) would enhance the user experience in some situations. Some clients would see this as a benefit to better align the Anaplan processes with the owner of each process.

Noemi.andres · ‎10-28-2020

Hi @Kunal0489 If you could share more details regarding your source module and target module's dimensionality that would be helpful. Also, as your line item name has a special character you will need to ensure it has the single quotes before and after the name, so please try the following formula: Unit Price % = 'REV04 Price Growth Rates'.'Unit Price%'[LOOKUP: 'SYS04 Location Details Module'.Country, LOOKUP: 'SYS06 Product Details'.Product Family] Regards, Noemi

Noemi.andres · ‎10-28-2020

Hi @johan.marketoft This will depend on the settings of the import action. Assuming you are running the import within the same model (i.e. not doing a model A to model B import for the update of the code), ensure you are mapping the import based on the name of the list as highlighted on my screenshot attached. This should then recognise the numbered list ID of the employee from your saved view and update the code accordingly. Regards, Noemi

Noemi.andres · ‎10-21-2020

Thanks @Manuela_Apostol , this would be a wonderful addition to the existing functionalities of the add-in. I can see some of our clients would love having the option to pull the code/name depending on the needs @MagaliP

Noemi.andres · ‎10-21-2020

I totally agree that this would enhance the page user friendliness by keeping all selections/filters together. It would be a great addition to the boards as well, posing similar benefits.

Noemi.andres · ‎10-01-2020

Thanks for sharing @AlejandroGomez, nice way of embedding the model documentation/instructions into the model!

Noemi.andres · ‎09-21-2020

I discovered recently that the order of the dimensions in the Applies To defines the order of the dimensions for the drill down too, so you could potentially change it to the most common asked order when drilling down. Note this depends on the Summary method as well, but for line items with "Sum" summary method then it works in a reversed order (i.e. the last dimension in the applies to will appear first in the drill down, and so on). Anyway it's not so dynamic so giving the option to the user to choose which one to drill down on first would be wonderful!

Noemi.andres · ‎09-14-2020

This would be a great addition, saving space for extra line items that are currently needed to get around this issue.

Noemi.andres · ‎08-12-2020

It would be useful to be able to publish the page/context selectors as a separate card in the New UX boards so you can decide where on the page you want it to be located instead of being either at the top-right corner or on each of the cards/board elements. This request would pose additional flexibility as at the moment if you have the dimension selectors on one of the elements of the page it does not synchronise to the other elements unless you click on the items you want to sync.

Noemi.andres · ‎08-10-2020

We have the option to change the users access in the new UX based on their role but at the moment this is done for each board/worksheet independently. It would be great to have the option to change the userss access for an entire app at once and this would apply to all the boards/worksheets within it. This would benefit changing the access in a faster way which can speed up other processes. For example, when you copy a DEV App to make it your new PROD App, you potentially want to check that everything works as expected before letting the end-users work with it. Having multiple boards/worksheets within an app and needing to restrict users access for each of them independently makes it a longer process.

Noemi.andres · ‎07-10-2020

Indeed it would be really useful to have the Copy branch functionality available in the NUX. It would be even better if we could let the user input the Code for the new member of the list too!

Noemi.andres · ‎04-07-2020

This would be a great addition to the export capabilities. Additionally to having the option to export the LIS field as the name or code this will enable leaving it blank too as we can do with normal lists at the moment.

Noemi.andres · ‎03-31-2020

Hi @Sravan_Kumar I think we may need some more details to make sure we can help you with this question. If you need the children to do the calculation but just want to show the parent values on a dashboard you could right click on the hierarchy within your module and click on "Select Levels to show" to hide the leaf level item. If you are trying to pull these values into a different module could you share the dimensionality of the target module so we can best advise what the best approach is? Regards, Noemi

Noemi.andres · ‎03-31-2020

Thank you @sprender, it's really useful to know when the targeted release is!

Noemi.andres · ‎03-26-2020

It is already possible to drill down in the New UX! This is a great improvement many people was waiting for. However, it is currently not possible to drill down further down after the first level of drill down which would add much more value. Users usually find that they need to drill down a few times until they get what they were looking for. This functionality may be on the roadmap (or even under development already!) but haven't seen anything on the releases calendar yet.

Noemi.andres · ‎02-11-2020

Hi @mikeng I agree with @Misbah 's solution if you indeed just want one unique "recruitment" member for your chart. It may be worth mentioning that if you use the new UX to display your chart, then Anaplan does not display the automatically generated ID number. However it will show the "recruitment" with the same name but in two different lines. See an example attached. Hope this helps! Noemi

Noemi.andres · ‎01-17-2020

@alexpavel this is a great idea! It would be useful as this situation happens often and having an extra level of the composite hierarchy is not always the most efficient/best-looking solution. As you say there are some current functionalities that would need to be revisited as basically this change would mean mixing properties from ragged hierarchies and composite hierarchies. The example you've put for retrieving the PARENT would clearly be a big debate. For me, the ideal situation would be to have the option of telling Anaplan which PARENT you are referring to, so by using an extension of the PARENT function to determine if it's the ancestor parent or the next levels' parent. The idea of making it fixed to one of them only does not seem dynamic enough. Another functionality which would need to change is the selecting the levels to show option. However, if Anaplan treats the extra children as the top level item (so as an extra "level" within the lowest level of the composite hierarchy) then this would work fine as it would allow you to choose which level to show from the lowest level of the hierarchy too.

Noemi.andres · ‎01-17-2020

I think this is a great idea, glad to see it is on the Roadmap! It would be great if we also had the functionality to choose the format of the data labels shown in the chart. For example, if it's a value shown in thousands or millions, the number of decimals, etc.

Noemi.andres · ‎01-16-2020

It would be useful to be able to search for an app within the Apps view in the same way we have the option to search for models within the models view. At the moment if the list of Apps is large you need to scroll until finding the right one (or use Ctrl+F and search it with the in-browser searching options).

Noemi.andres · ‎01-16-2020

In this forum you can find some interesting facts about which one of the functions (PREVIOUS, OFFSET, LAG) is better to use in terms of performance. Hope you find it useful! https://community.anaplan.com/t5/Anaplan-Platform-Discussions/Performance-Comparison-OFFSET-LAG-PREVIOUS-LOOKUP/m-p/51140#M7603

Noemi.andres · ‎01-16-2020

Hi @DingZ Assuming your module in Anaplan has Years as the Time dimension and your columns headers as line items, then the formula would work if you use functions such as PREVIOUS(), OFFSET(), POST() to refer to the previous time periods and retrieve these values into the designed period I would personally build it as: PREVIOUS(Effective Rates)*(1+Inflation Rate) Hope this helps!

Noemi.andres · ‎01-15-2020

Hi @tejaswini Alternatively, you could use an image for the title of the dashboards, which then allows you to use different colours for the background colour (within the image) of the titles in each dashboard. See here how to add images to dashboards: https://help.anaplan.com/anapedia/Content/Dashboards_and_Visualization/Build%20Dashboards/Add_Images_Dashboards.htm?_ga=2.62340332.1516836416.1578992089-822864612.1576492379 Anyway, if in doubt the user just needs to read the name of the tab they've got opened at the top. Hope this helps!