About Sathya

Darco

This is essential for end users in order to make it easier to navigate and work...

alexpavel · ‎06-09-2021

Indeed it would be really helpful if the order of the context selector could be customizable !

ChrisHeathcote · ‎06-03-2021

@1636583 Perhaps it would be useful to introduce a hierarchy where each combination of filter views is determined to be the parent. You could then use the parent item to filter the view and successfully apply breakback to the parent. This will then successfully distribute the change to the correct items as it will only apply to the children of each summary view.

Sathya · ‎05-25-2021

Hi @pdekas , Please check in the General Lists --> Display Name Property is marked as "Display Name" for that list. Thanks Sathya

whitby · ‎04-22-2021

Agreed Sathya - would be nice to have conditional formatting in fields similar to the old UX. A workaround I have found for the time being is to use KPI cards:

jasonblinn · ‎04-20-2021

I have done it both ways and I personally don't think there is a right or a wrong, just an "It depends" Using ALM allows you to have different data sets, maybe you have a size constraint and can not have a full copy of production, so you just choose a couple of categories, or customers (Depending on your hierarchies). In many large organizations, there are strict guidelines to say that Production data cannot be in a development model as well. If having one works for you, you are using the same data and data sets, and everything else is running smoothly, keep it as you have it! Jason

Sathya · ‎04-15-2021

Hi Team, Can we have the ability to search the existing dashboards when we try to publish a Module/Process/Action. Currently we have to scroll and search for the existing dashboards while publishing. Thanks Sathya

Candy · ‎04-10-2021

Thank you everyone for your assistance 😊 .

ANS · ‎03-02-2021

@Sathya , Remapping the source to correct model solved the issue. Thanks a lot for that. However, I still wanted to understand the reason for remapping the source model. At the end of Sprint 1 and before starting Sprint 2, we are asked to map the Source Model(Data Hub Model) from the Target Model(Supply Chain Model).This should take care of mapping from Target to Source. My understanding from the above screenshot is "Level 2 Data Hub **Your Name**" is already mapped to "Level 2 Data Hub_Narender". That means system knows: "Level 2 Data Hub **Your Name**" = "Level 2 Data Hub_Narender" Then, why the process is getting failed when we run "Import Data from Hub" action? Furthermore, I am able to edit other pre-existing actions like "2.3 Import Size", "9.2 Import Opening stock" etc., but not "9.1 Import Historic Volumes" from the Action tab. Which does have the same source model name "Level 2 Data Hub **Your Name**". Please check the screenshots below: Thanks for you help. Naren

ChrisHeathcote · ‎02-04-2021

@Star The first period of the year is effectively a property of the year time dimension. Therefore, create a module only dimensioned by time dimension and formatted as year. Create a line item for each time period you want to reference and ensure they are formatted for that time period; months, Qtrs etc Use the following formula = period(start()) The formula above so default to the period at the start of each year in the calendar. In your target time settings module reference the above line items using the following. =YEARVALUE(YearTimeProperties.First Period) = ITEM(TIME) This will check the first period matching the dimension of the target module and the Year time properties. As Anaplan does not have a native week time scale that can be used as a time dimension you will need to map the first week into the year manually in your year time settings module. Then instead of referencing Time with an ITEM function you will reference the weeks list. Good luck, Chris

Sathya · ‎01-07-2021

Hi Team, When we rename the model and remapped to the same model with a new name in Model Settings-->Source Models, it is not reflecting dynamically in Import Data Sources/Imports. To see the new model name, we have to manually re-map the Import actions. It would be great if we have this feature in Anaplan- As soon as the model is remapped to the new name, the corresponding Import Data sources/Imports should change dynamically. Thanks Sathya

DavidSmith · ‎11-19-2020

@rolympia I'm going to stick to my belief that apart for the known exceptions, List Properties are not needed, but I will say, as part of the new Formula Editor we will be looking to unify the experience to create a formula will be the same whether it is a line item or a list property David

Rashmih · ‎10-26-2020

Modelers should have the option to either create a Subset by action or by formula. There can be a setting to choose this while creating a Subset

ashish.banka · ‎10-21-2020

@Sathya Thanks for your suggestion. It worked. Anaplan Support team forwarded the ticket to academy@anaplan.com and they could resolve the issue.

FabianC · ‎09-17-2020

Just a heads up... if both positive and negative amounts are entered you may get the sum 0 (zero) and the row will be filtered away. To solve that potential issue you can create a filter module with 2 line items, 1 collect() and the other boolean with summary Any, If collect<>0 then true.... use the boolean as filter in original module

vicky_ascencio · ‎09-08-2020

Hayk · ‎07-30-2020

Found this idea while I was trying to archive 200 models on our training WS

Sathya · ‎07-26-2020

Hi @sanjit_m2020, Kindly send your query to support@anaplan.com ,they will help you. Thanks Sathya.

praba71 · ‎07-16-2020

Thanks @Sathya . I was able to add the button in the dashboard.

AnkitGupta · ‎05-21-2020

@Sathya Figured it... Display Name should be in column (in the saved view of the joined module) for it to work. Thank you for the detailed steps in the doc!

tingtingxia · ‎05-13-2020

@Harsha Understand that. But my subsidiary view line items are crossed with 2 dimensions as below.

JaredDolich · ‎05-12-2020

@sharmagh Just an idea. Could you set up a system module (only dimension is the list you want to pull the previous list item from)? In that system module create a line item that puts a numeric sequence on the list. Then create another list using that sequence number as the code. This will serve as a mapping that allows you to find the previous list item. Not a pretty solution but it should work. You'll also have to decide what happens when you get to the first item in the list, since there isn't a previous on that.

ankit_cheeni · ‎04-27-2020

Thanks @Kanishq17 @einas.ibrahim for validating the behavior. Cheers!

Star · ‎04-20-2020

@johndorma Thank you 🙂

Sathya · ‎04-18-2020

Hi @Star, If a process contain 3 Import Actions, then you have to grant access to those 3 Import Actions in Settings---> Users-->Roles-->Actions. If you do so, then you will get access to the process automatically. Thanks Sathya

Star · ‎04-17-2020

I realised it has to do with granting access to Modules. I subsequently relooked at the 'Used Modules' and the dashboard and matched them against the Modules assigned to the role. It worked!

Star · ‎04-17-2020

@kathleenseiler Yes, the filter was the culprit. It was applied to the Saved As view. I assigned the filter module to the role and it worked. Thank you very much 🙂

vicky_ascencio · ‎09-08-2020

ChrisHeathcote · ‎04-15-2020

An alternative is to use selective access and only provide write access to those list items required by each user. They will only be able to see those list items allocated to them when setting them up as a user. When selecting which list items that are visible do not select the parent and only allow access to the child items at the hierarchy level required. Test this approach by limiting your own access to a selection from the list. Be mindful of NOT turning off you admin rights as you will not be able to reverse the change.

davidmccarty · ‎03-31-2020

Yep, Matt in support set me up and was able to give me access to the model. Thanks!