How to get the export ID other than the API method

Hi,

In the Anaplan account, where to find the export id in the account? I tried through the Rest API-Postman and I am getting just the square brackets. Is there any other way to find the export id?

Answers

  • MarkWarren
    edited December 2022

    Did you use this syntax to list exports?
    https://api.anaplan.com/2/0/workspaces/{workspaceId}/models/{modelId}/exports

     

    Anaplan Integration API V2 Guide and Reference · Apiary

  • Antonio_Flor
    edited December 2022

    Hi @Sara2021,

     

    I got stuck in the same situation and these were the steps I discover to find the Export/ Process ID's through postman:

    1. Get and account on Postman (the online version is just fine)
    2. Create an Environment and add these Variables
      • vWorkspaceID
      • vModelID

    3. Search for Anaplan and select the official Anaplan collections

    4. Run  GET {{auth_base_url}}/token/authenticate

    Make sure you’ve selected the Environment with the Workspace and Model id variables before running

    Select Basic authorisation and put  in the Username and Password

     

    5. Run GET {{int_v2_base_url}}/2/0/workspaces/{{vWorkspaceID}}/models/{{vModelID}}/processes

    Make sure you’ve selected the Environment with the Workspace and Model id variables before running

    Select Inherit authorisation

    You can then save results an open them on a  notepad

  • ShubhamCh
    edited December 2022

    Hi @Sara2021 

     

    The easiest way to find export/process id is to use the following mentioned url:- 

    https://us1a.app.anaplan.com/2/0/workspaces/your_workspace_id_here/models/your_model_id_here/processes

    • You should be logged in your Anaplan account before using this url.
    • Change "processes" to "exports" or "imports", to get IDs for export and import actions.

    @Antonio_Flor you should try this method as well.

     

    Thanks!

    -Shubham

  • Antonio_Flor
    edited December 2022

    @ShubhamCh ,


    thanks, that works perfectly and is far more simple than postman?

    no idea why is not more prominent in documentation :(.

    Regards

     

    A