Hi - per the title, I was curious whether it was a known 'feature' that lines solely leveraging TIMESUM do not provide drill down information beyond the parameters (if used)?
E.g. even if you drill down on a field with values, if the function solely uses TIMESUM, you don't get a breakdown of the values by period (or values at all), you just get the parameters that were used in the function.
I've seen this behaviour previously but left it as TIMESUM wasn't really a function we relied on, but given some of the newer use cases we have coming through, it's become a requirement (and MOVINGSUM will not suffice).
In my testing, it doesn't matter if you use TIMESUM on a time dimension or without time; behaviour is still the same.
Hoping to get either confirmation of the above, or advice as to whether I'm missing something?
Cheers,
L
