Drill to Transaction Functionality in the New UX

Drill to Transaction Functionality is considered critical for some partners/clients as it's functionality that has no alternate solution. I have heard specifically from FP&A implementations regarding allocations, as well as ICM use cases, but would love anyone giving kudos to leave comments with additional examples of it's use.

Creating this idea because the standard way of submitting feedback via the New UX is only relevant to those actively using the New UX.

Comments

Miran

Status changed to: New

nathan_rudman

starting a major Finance project, DTT is a key part of it. Won't be able to use NUX...

MCarls02

Agreed - this would be nice to have in the NUX.

dkolka

We're embarking on Finance revamp project that includes building out of a Fi data hub to support multiple spoke models. At least 2 of the spoke models will need DTT. One of the spoke models already uses the existing functionality in Classic. However, going forward classic really isn't an option as all existing UI's are moving to the UX. Either is mirroring transaction data in the spoke models.

Akhtar.shahbaz

@Miran

Do you have any update on DDT, when it will release in NUX?

Miran

Hi @vicky_ascencio, could we get a status update on this idea? Thanks!

emr21a

We desperately need this feature with our company. I am having to update details shown on cards in both the NewUX and the classic dashboard. Anaplan is a manual tool in most aspects of how we use it and users being able to Drill to Transaction in the NewUX is extremely important to get out of manually updating 2 different areas, plus users being able to see their own data. We lost a lot of functionality in the NewUX.

@Miran @vicky_ascencio

James.sharrett

This comes up often and the basic functionality has existed in most EPM tools for a long time. At a minimum, being able to pass in a URL parameter in the NUX page link to allow setting the focus across models would help in setting the page focus to make the process look more seamless.

BPifer

Is there any update here from Anaplan?

david.savarin

Any news ?

I had understood that (New) UX would migrate all classic features, but I was a bit disappointed to see drill to transactions was just available on the model side.

Drill Down / Drill Through (e.g. Drill to Transactions) are key features for any business planning use case ^^

NoahJ

The Dill to Transaction is an amazing feature, and will continue to be a pain point for customers who use it but want to migrate to the (New) UX.

Additionally, if/when it is developed for the New UX, the requirement that all SUM mapping lines must be in the same module should be removed - Drill to Transaction really just shows the source module with an automatically generated filter that matches the cell intersection that you selected, it seems feasible for that filter to include line items from other modules. This would improve flexibility of the feature.

kjochim

Any update on this?

harish_bk

+1, we for now are just using Classic DB for this and linking the same to New UX, for few where lists consumed are less we have created filters

Getting this in New DB and removing the sum formula limitation would be amazing add on

DeveloperCYT

Any news on this really important development?

Quick Links

New ideas

Model Map - Exporting Functionality
While the Model Map functionality already exists in Anaplan, it becomes difficult to navigate when working with large models. I would like to see enhanced support for full export capabilities of the model schema (DISCO). This would greatly streamline documentation efforts and save time when capturing model status across…
Better communication regarding platform changes
I'd like to request implementing a formal notification system for upcoming platform changes and updates. This would be incredibly valuable for the Anaplan community for several reasons: Real Impact Example:Recently (Sept 2025), an unannounced Cloudworks change restricted .csv000 file imports. This resulted in: Failed…
Passwordless SOS Authentication
We recently noticed that users that have enabled passwordless authentication through Microsoft are no longer able to login to Anaplan via single sign on. After entering a ticket via Anaplan, it seems that this is a hardcoded platform parameter which specifies that authentication must occur through a password-based feature…