Could you tell me what I am doing wrong in this formula.Demand = 'DEM03 Demand Forecast'.Final Forecast[LOOKUP: 'SYS08 SKU Details'.Product]
Check the dimensionality of your source module and target module and decide if you need LOOKUP or SUM.
I am also stuck on this question. I am struggling to understand why my mappings are not correct if the source module has the following dimentions: SKU, Accounts.
This is my formula: 'DEM03 Demand Forecast'.Final Forecast[SUM:'SYS08 SKU Details'.Code,SUM:'SYS09 Account Details'.Location]
Could you please help me understand where am I going wrong?
The Target module: is DEM04 --- Dimension: G3 Location, P3 SKU, Time (Months)
The Source module: DEM03 --------Dimension: P3 SKU, Accounts, Time (Weeks)
For LOOKUP to work,
That leaves up with Accounts, right?
Do we care about Demand broken down by Accounts? No, we are looking for the demand for P3 SKU in all Accounts. If you don't provide a LOOKUP with Accounts, the formula will return the data (demand) for all items in the missing dimensions i.e. Accounts (Top Level- All Accounts) because it doesn't know which Account data you are looking for; and that's what we need.
That leaves us with nothing to provide in the LOOKUP formula. which means we don't need a LOOKUP. A direct reference will provide you with the data you are looking for.
As to the reason SUM is not the right formula here, that is because we are looking for Demand by P3 SKU and the Source has the demand by P3 SKU. so there is nothing to SUM.
I really care about explaining how to use LOOKUP and how to think about obtaining the answer more than the correct answer.
Let me know if I need to explain any point further or even in a different way,
@einas.ibrahim , you really helped me out! Thank you so much for such an elaborate explanation!
Hi @Yudashkin001 I'm glad it was helpful."Elaborate Explanations" is my brand, doesn't always work in my favor though😀If you have further questions while you are going through the training, post it, and mention me.Good Luck
Your explanation made so much more sense to me than the training itself. Thank you.
Thank you and shhhhhh, "they" will hear you and get mad at me 😂
Seriously, I'm happy I was able to help, if you have other questions please let me know.
I Use direct reference for my DEM04 demand formula referencing to DEM03 and did not use any of SUM OR LOOKUP function as suggested by you. But this is regarding the importing of file while doing to DAT02 in the FPA model, I am unable to get my SKU & LOCATION code as can be seen in detail in the below link, where I seek guidance but did not receive any reply, so seeking out to you.
Can you help me why my solution didn't match with smithevan18 as he was suggesting that we are missing on SUM formula for our location line item?
Hey @kunal_311 Happy to assist. Can you please separate this issue from other issues or posts. It will be clearer for me to understand and also make it easier for others to clearly find solutions to their issue in the future.
There are at least 2 different posts with different issues. I'll appreciate it if you create a new post simply explaining the issue you are facing.We can add a link to that post here after you create it if you think it'll help people find the answers they are looking for.
Care to explain a little more? Here is my issue:
I have a list that provides roles (name and code). I have data that provides employee and their role. In order to do a LOOKUP, I need to have my dimension as a list. Under the module that has the data, do I need an additional Line Item that associates the Role list to the Employee data?
@asage Happy to help.We are trying to organize the forums to make it easier for the community members when looking for answers. It seems like your issue is slightly different from the original issue of this post. It might even be for a completely different training.Please:
In relation to your specific question:
Some clarifications are needed. Please clarify which are your modules (source and target if you can), a Lookup is not done on a list, but rather a module.I believe if you arranged your information as I did in the screenshot below, It will be easier for you to form the question more clearly and for us to answer. You might even find the solution yourself.😊Focus on the top 2 lines only for now.
I'll be looking out for your independent post. Please make sure you mention me so I get notified.Good Luck
Thank you for such a great explanation. I was using a LOOKUP and you made this issue very easy to understand.
Thank you @ConRourke It makes me so happy to know I was able to simplify a concept and help someone. Please let me know if you have other issues in the future - by mentioning me in your post- and I'll be very happy to help when I can.
Thank you @cbevishnu1 You have no idea how much your words mean to me. I really appreciate it. Best of luck to you on your journey. 🍀
@einas.ibrahim thank you for the elaborate explanation! There were quite a few possibilities I was thinking of while trying to understand whether to use SUM or LOOKUP. However, the solution to the formula is pretty straightforward. Thanks, to your explanaiton, all those possibilities were covered up.
Hey @einas.ibrahim ,Thank you for the explanation , this cleared out so many things for me , but still when I take direct refernce for demand , the values are not matching with the example anaplan provided , can you please help me in uderstanding why is it so ?My output-
Anaplan example to check work-
Hey, Great explanation thanks
Hi Jash06, to get the output as it is in the exercise, you should add a sum statement with the SYS09 account details. This will allow you to aggregate by location.