Hello All, Can anyone suggest me which one is better between star schema and snowflake schema in Anaplan? I don't have much knowledge regarding both of these comparisons. Please suggest to me.
Hi,
In Anaplan, we don't refer to the Star or Snowflake schema, because these 2 schemas utilize the concept of a central Fact Table.
Instead we refer to the DISCO methodology https://community.anaplan.com/t5/Best-Practices/PLANS-This-Is-How-We-Model/ta-p/33530 , you can say the DISCO is like an enhanced Snowflake, it's enhanced because Anaplan stores transactional data where seen fit, and there could even be relationships between the multiple transactional data modules where seen fit.
However the common point i see between Star/Snowflake schema and DISCO is that Anaplan needs master data (aka List in Anaplan) to be populated first before the transactional data.
Thanks,
LipChean
With the Snowflake model, dimension analysis is easier. For example, “How many accounts or campaigns are online for a given advertiser?”
The Star schema model is useful for metrics analysis, such as “What is the revenue for a given customer?
Snowflake schemas offer the following benefits compared to normal star schemas:
Benefits of Star Schemas
Star schemas offer the following benefits:
I would go with Start schema, Want to know detailed information about Star Schema, Check this post.
There was an error rendering this rich post.
Hi all, The Client ID and Client Secret are available, intended for uploading and downloading files. Could anyone advise how to use these credentials DIRECTLY to make API requests? Thank you!
I have A6 as the parent list and two sibling lists: A6.5 and A7. The A7 list includes an attribute that maps to A6.5. In the UX, the user will select A6.5 using a content selector, and the grid (dimensioned by A7) should display only the A7 items associated with that selected A6.5. Since the selector is a page context and…