We currently operate with Apps that act as silos, but sometimes it would be good to have a centralised dashboard that can work as a connection across apps to ensure a seamless flow across the dashboards built.
Hi Bruno - you can actually do this now. I haven't seen documentation (to be honest I haven't really looked), but if you do the following, you can connect a single dashboard to multiple models:
Not the easiest/quickest way, but I have not found any other solution.
I was actually making an article about that exact logic today. I was planning on publishing it tomorrow. The downfall is that it does not follow PLANS
How does this not follow PLANS? I look at PLANS as more of a modeling guideline and not an App design guideline - sure you want the App to be logical, auditable, etc. but I don't see how connecting to another app clashes with PLANS?
This will be summary of the article:
"In summary, this article has presented an alternative to connect multiple Apps in a seamless way through a “Central distributor” dashboard. The App connectivity comes at a price, so please evaluate whether is worth applying it since this approach is not sustainable nor auditable (https://community.anaplan.com/kb/articles/70772-plans) given that once you try to edit the cards with hyperlinks, they will show as blank. Nevertheless, the links created remain in place once the dashboard is moved to another App, but the dashboard also needs to be moved multiple times to configure all the hyperlinks required, which is a repetitive task and may become an issue once hyperlinks change. "
Basically, once you set up the hyperlinks is not very auditable since the hyperlink is set as blank, and once you apply it to scale it is not sustainable, as every change needs to be applied across the board
@ryanwcloud,
Please find the article in the following link:
Feel free to suggest any ideas there and thank you for the answer here. It was funny to receive it just today.
@BrunoRodriguez
Arguably, NUX flies in the face of PLANS. It exists outside of ALM and outside of model history. Changes to NUX pages cannot be audited because there is no change log. Manually propagating NUX changes from Dev to QA to UAT to Prod is prone to error. Utilizing module views instead of custom views mitigates some of this, but we sacrifice formatting options in exchange for maintainability.
Hello @CommunityMember127794,
While I agree with all your points, the fact that you cannot know where a hyperlink will take you just by simply editing the dashboard (with the current alternative to this idea) is something worrysome.
Happy to hear more thoughts though!
As an Anaplan tenant admin, I want to enhance security for external users who are added as SSO exceptions by enabling Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for their accounts. Currently, these users authenticate with only a username and password, which poses a security risk. Additionally, I request the ability to assign a…
In Workspace A developed a model called XYZ2025, which was archived after the fiscal year ended. Months later, a regional team in Workspace B wants to use that model as a foundation for their XYZ2026. Here’s what happens: Workspace B cannot directly access or import the archived model. Workspace A must unarchive the model,…
Hi All, Recently I have seen great customization to UX (numbers to percentage), it was really good when it comes to line item subset (combination of numbers/% value). It would be good if we are able to customize the negative sign in UX, as management would prefer to view numbers (if negative used bracket), % value (if…
